Decisionbase
 

Psych Community


Welcome Message
Registration Tutorial
Nickname:
Password:
Save Password

 All Forums
 Community Improvements
 Regular Meetings With Voice & Text Chat
 Should We Have Regular Small Group Meetings?
Previous Page | Next Page
 Forum Locked  Printer Friendly
Author  Topic 
Page: of 5

Administrator
Administrator

15007 Posts
Gratitude: 3353
Very caringVery wiseVery funnyVery honestI agree

Posted - 02/14/2010 :  19:47:59  Show Profile  Visit Administrator's Homepage
Some self-help groups (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous) stress "making a list of all persons we had harmed", and "making amends to them all" (if such amends don't cause harm).

Other self-help groups do not stress that making amends is a necessary step in recovery.

Question:

Should our weekly small groups stress "making a list of all persons we had harmed", and "making amends to them all"?
Go to Top of Page

Administrator
Administrator

15007 Posts
Gratitude: 3353
Very caringVery wiseVery funnyVery honestI agree

Posted - 02/14/2010 :  20:08:00  Show Profile  Visit Administrator's Homepage
Many self-help groups (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous) firmly believe that they should never be organized (with a national leader and bureaucracy).

In this way, these self-help groups want to prevent ever becoming a cult with a dictatorial leader.

Question:

Do you believe that our weekly small group meetings should never be organized (beyond electing their rotating moderators)?

That is, every small group should operate independently without having an overall leader and bureaucracy governing all the groups.

(The role of our MyTherapy administrative staff would be limited to refereeing disputes between group members. Otherwise, our administrative staff would never dictate how a group should operate their meetings.)


Go to Top of Page

Administrator
Administrator

15007 Posts
Gratitude: 3353
Very caringVery wiseVery funnyVery honestI agree

Posted - 02/14/2010 :  20:24:20  Show Profile  Visit Administrator's Homepage
Many self-help groups (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous) firmly believe that they should never be drawn into public controversy (e.g., the debates on abortion, religion in the schools, politics, etc.)?

Question:

Do you believe that our weekly small group meetings should never be drawn into public controversy (over issues not related to mental illness)?
Go to Top of Page

loggedin
Incredible Member (2000+ posts)

3838 Posts
Gratitude: 2525
Very caringVery wiseVery funnyVery honestI agree

Posted - 02/15/2010 :  00:37:17  Show Profile
The focus of the group should depend on the needs of the members. Maybe groups should be organized such, if there are enough participants in total.

Let yourself believe that we are born innocent -Sarah McLachlin
Go to Top of Page

loggedin
Incredible Member (2000+ posts)

3838 Posts
Gratitude: 2525
Very caringVery wiseVery funnyVery honestI agree

Posted - 02/15/2010 :  00:43:12  Show Profile
Will there be chips and soda?

Let yourself believe that we are born innocent -Sarah McLachlin
Go to Top of Page

loggedin
Incredible Member (2000+ posts)

3838 Posts
Gratitude: 2525
Very caringVery wiseVery funnyVery honestI agree

Posted - 02/15/2010 :  00:52:01  Show Profile
Suggestion: add a rule that participants can post 'listen only' or 'log out' if the situation becomes too stressful - and 'pass' if they want to reamain an active participant but want to skip their turn, if turn-taking is the format.

Let yourself believe that we are born innocent -Sarah McLachlin
Go to Top of Page

Administrator
Administrator

15007 Posts
Gratitude: 3353
Very caringVery wiseVery funnyVery honestI agree

Posted - 02/15/2010 :  09:59:22  Show Profile  Visit Administrator's Homepage
Question:

In a weekly small group meeting, should there be a button which a member could press that would indicate that they want to remain silent and not speak during their turn to speak.
Go to Top of Page

Zep
Incredible Member (2000+ posts)

2298 Posts
Gratitude: 965
Very caringVery wiseVery funnyVery honestI agree

Posted - 02/15/2010 :  12:24:38  Show Profile
One thing I thought of, Phil - the imperative of confidentiality. The agreement that what happens within the small group stays within that group and does not spill over into the general forum (unless there is consensus, of course). I can foresee huge problems if that happens....

Z.
Go to Top of Page

Administrator
Administrator

15007 Posts
Gratitude: 3353
Very caringVery wiseVery funnyVery honestI agree

Posted - 02/15/2010 :  20:25:38  Show Profile  Visit Administrator's Homepage
Question: (Reworded, so please answer again)

Confidentiality: Should there be agreement amongst group members that what is said within the group does not leave the group?
Go to Top of Page

Zep
Incredible Member (2000+ posts)

2298 Posts
Gratitude: 965
Very caringVery wiseVery funnyVery honestI agree

Posted - 02/15/2010 :  22:47:44  Show Profile
(Sorry to be picky, Phil, but could you re-word that last question please - a little ambiguous. Perhaps "Should there be agreement amongst group members that what is said within the group does not leave the group?" or something like that...)

Good point Zep,

I have reworded the question as you requested. Your wording is better.

Go to Top of Page

Administrator
Administrator

15007 Posts
Gratitude: 3353
Very caringVery wiseVery funnyVery honestI agree

Posted - 02/26/2010 :  18:54:58  Show Profile  Visit Administrator's Homepage
Online dating services, like E-Harmony, have members complete a questionnaire so that they can be matched to other individuals sharing the same characteristics.

Question:

Should we electronically match individuals sharing the same problems when forming a small group? (Individuals wouldn't be matched by their diagnoses, just by their problems.)
Go to Top of Page

Administrator
Administrator

15007 Posts
Gratitude: 3353
Very caringVery wiseVery funnyVery honestI agree

Posted - 02/26/2010 :  19:15:33  Show Profile  Visit Administrator's Homepage
When one person tells another person what to do (e.g., "You should leave your boyfriend because he is a jerk"); it usually offends.

Alcoholics Anonymous prohibits direct advice giving. Instead, it believes that members should teach by personal example. That is, a member should just tell what happened in their own life. Thus AA members will tell their story (i.e., "this is what happened to me"), but will not give concrete advice (i.e., "this is what you should do").

Question:

Should our small groups prohibit direct advice giving? Instead, should our groups promote teaching by personal example (e.g., "I can't tell you what you should do, but this is what helped me").
Go to Top of Page

loggedin
Incredible Member (2000+ posts)

3838 Posts
Gratitude: 2525
Very caringVery wiseVery funnyVery honestI agree

Posted - 02/26/2010 :  21:21:51  Show Profile
Is this better? My boyfriend was a jerk, and I left him.

Let yourself believe that we are born innocent -Sarah McLachlin
Go to Top of Page

Zep
Incredible Member (2000+ posts)

2298 Posts
Gratitude: 965
Very caringVery wiseVery funnyVery honestI agree

Posted - 02/26/2010 :  21:56:15  Show Profile
Yes - it's less confronting and directive. After all, there is always a risk with giving advice - if it doesn't turn out, you can be blamed.

Z.
Go to Top of Page

Administrator
Administrator

15007 Posts
Gratitude: 3353
Very caringVery wiseVery funnyVery honestI agree

Posted - 03/09/2010 :  22:29:40  Show Profile  Visit Administrator's Homepage
STEPS TO RECOVERY #1: OVERCOMING DENIAL

Some self-help groups (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous) list the steps to recovery. They teach that the first step to recovery is to admit that you have a problem (i.e., overcome denial).

Question:

In our small group meetings, should we stress that the first step to recovery is to admit that you have a problem (i.e., overcome denial)?
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 5  Topic   
Previous Page | Next Page
Jump To:
MyTherapy Communities © MyTherapy Go To Top Of Page
TotalTodayYesterday
Topics: 33407
Posts: 286540
New Topics: 0
New Posts: 0
New Topics: 0
New Posts: 0
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05